Friday, December 29, 2006

Wiring for an IP Home

When my wife and I began to plan our new home 3 years ago, I was determined to wire it for everything under the sun. Heading up a company that was leading the custom electronics market into the next era of technology and applications, put a significant self-imposed burden on me. Mostly because I felt that instead of keeping up with the Jetsons, it was my responsibility to ‘be’ the Jetsons.

When I started the research process, my head was filled with questions, and for awhile it seemed that the more I researched, the more questions I would generate. What cables, standards and technologies would I use in our new IP home – Coax, CAT5e, fiber, Ethernet, wireless or power line technology? And what connections would I use for my displays – HDMI, DVI, Component or other? What format would I use for streaming audio around the home – MP-3, AAC, WMA, or WAV? Whose products would I use to compliment NetStreams’ multi-room audio/video/control products, for things like lighting, cameras, thermostats, theater products, etc…? I did know one thing, and that was that I did not want to narrow down product decisions three years before our home was to be completed because of the extremely fast pace of which technology and products change in our market. I did not want to wire my home exclusively or specific to any manufacturer’s products, because I wanted our infrastructure to address the many products available at the time my home was completed in the future, and the many products coming in the future beyond that point in time. These decisions would involve a lot of research because many of these standards were still under development or just coming to the market, and were unproven.

Months later I reached my conclusion and decision, and almost three years later, it has proven to have been the right one. What I determined after the many months of research was that there was no ‘one single standard’ that would address all of my needs. Here is what I learned:

The CEA 802.3 standard (Ethernet) is the most widely used standard, internationally, for both residential and commercial computer networks, control and now audio and video distribution. CAT5e is the most widely used cable for computer networks, control, telephone, professional video distribution, and more. I learned that this 20+ year old standard is solid and provides us with the right infrastructure for current and future products. The CEA 802.3 standard suggests “home runs” from each outlet. A “home run” is a direct run of cable from the “head-end” location (the location where telephone, cable/satellite and home network cables are originated inside the home) to one or more locations in each room. Using this standard would allow me to later choose from the myriad of products and technologies available for distribution of our video, while also providing us with the cables needed for our home network and telephone needs, in each room.

OK, one decision made…. CAT5e everywhere.

Much like electricity is distributed from a central panel(s) to locations around the home, and the electricity is fed to these panels from the meter box, where the power company connects their services to, telephone, home network, cable, and satellite service providers connect to boxes outside of your home known as ‘demarcation points’ and their services are then extended to the panels where they are distributed around your home. This wiring infrastructure is called “structured wring”.

The most widely used cable for structured wiring is called a “2x2 ”, which is a bundled cable with four cables inside; two RG-6 (coax) cables used for cable/satellite television or analog camera distribution, and two CAT5e cables, used for telephone, home network, video distribution and more. The standard for structured wiring cable is the TIA/EIA 568. Although this standard covers a good portion of my infrastructure needs, I learned that implementing only this standard would not be enough, because this standard did not address the needs of our lighting control system, our multi-room audio and video system, our home control system, our security system, our IP cameras, our thermostats, or home theater. It is mostly designed for distributing home network, cable/satellite television and telephone. However, if I want to distribute high definition television signals from a central location to all of our rooms, or want to centralize my three satellite boxes so that I don’t have to add a box per television set in our home, which in our case is 8-10 TVs, traditional structured wiring solutions can’t help me. This typical requires a professionally designed system and a video matrix switch.

So that I don’t turn this blog post into a book, I’ll now summarize what I did for my wiring. Because I believe that in the future most products will be IP-based or IP-controlled, I made sure to run CAT 5e almost everywhere that I anticipated installing a product or system.

Audio Distribution: For our multi-room audio needs, I chose to use the CEA 2030 standard, as I found this to be the most flexible and best standard. This standard requires a CAT5e cable plus a 4-conductor cable (#16 or #14 gauge wires) from the head-end audio/video location to each keypad, then looped up to the speakers. This can be accomplished with two separate cables or a Siamese cable that is a cable that offers both the CAT5e and 4-conductors in one jacket, making it easier and cheaper to install. I found that other standards address the distribution of analog audio or digital audio, but not both; and I found no other standard that addressed the requirements of an IP-Based audio distribution system. The CEA2030 addresses the needs of analog, digital and IP-Based audio distribution systems. Because my company is involved in the development of technology for IP speakers, I knew that having a CAT5e available at the speaker for network connectivity, along with the 4-conductors for power was critical.

Video Distribution: Because I wanted to distribute high definition video signals around my home from centrally-located satellite boxes, so we can access and view content from any video source, (including our TIVO), from any room in the home, I found that we could not use the typical coax distribution in my GE Security structured wiring panel. Structured wiring panels typically use traditional radio frequency (RF) amplifiers and splitters for its video distribution. These do not distribute high definition signals from the new HD sources such as BluRay or HD-DVD, nor do they distribute Dolby Digital, DTS, or other similar audio effects. However we still ran 2x2 cables from the structured wiring panel to each TV location in the home, and in addition ran CAT5e cables from each location to my equipment rack. This CAT5e would be later connected to a NetStreams Panorama video distribution system for distribution of our standard and high definition video signals from our satellite boxes and our centralized BluRay player around the home. More on this product line on a future post.

Telephone / Computer Network: This one was the simplest of all of the wiring standards to implement. Since a 2x2 cable contains two CAT5e cables, by running a 2x2 home run to each location that I wanted Ethernet and/or telephone, I was able to achieve both. And in locations where I did not need telephone, I could assign the two CAT5e to our home network.

Lighting Control: Wiring for lighting control was a little different because it forced me to decide, in advance, on the type of lighting system that I was going to use and the manufacturer. The reason for this is that lighting devices fall into two general categories: a) dimmer/relay switches that are installed at the traditional switch location and then networked through CAT5e, RF (wireless), or power lines, and b) dimmer/relay modules that are installed in one or more central locations somewhere in the home. Each of these methods has its own requirements, costs, and benefits. After weighting all of these heavily and looking at many different products, I decided to use the Lutron HomeWorks products. This system required us to run a shielded CAT5e cable from each keypad location back to multiple panels that would house our Lutron dimmer and relay modules and processors. The shielded cable can be Class II (CL-2) in-wall rated cable, but Class III (CL-3) burial grade – is recommended. These cables are comprised of a pair of 18 gauge wires for power and pair of 22 gauge shielded wires with a drain ground for communications.

Other: The above wiring schemes covered the majority of the needs of our IP home, but there were other subsystems and products to think about and each of these carried its own wiring needs: Security system, Intercom, Cameras, Thermostats, Drapes/shades, Pool controls, Garage door openers, Irrigation system, Outdoor lighting and more. If you are integrating these products with your whole house control system, the wiring requirements are different than when these systems are installed ‘stand-alone’.

If my blog has been helpful to you in any way, please drop me a note. I would love to hear from you and learn what other parts of my ‘building an IP home’ experience would be helpful to you: info@netstreams.com.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

The Great Audio Experience

Last year I blogged about the very audible difference between MP3 and uncompressed (WAV) audio file formats, particularly when it comes to good quality home speakers and audio systems. I must say I am extremely humbled to find so many in the artist community that support this idea of great quality audio. Compression really does ruin their work. Artists spend quite a lot of time in the studio working on the sound and ambiance of their creation, and when they do hear their songs played back over a compressed format, it can be downright demoralizing.

And now they're starting to do something about it.

The band 3 Doors Down has joined forces with the Consumer Electronics Association to promote what they call Great Audio Experience. They just launched their website today and it was very interesting to hear from them how they view audio quality.

Check it out by clicking the link below:






If my blog has been helpful to you in any way, or if you have any comments or questions, please drop me a note. I would love to hear from you: hermansblog@netstreams.com

Friday, November 03, 2006

Is it Christmas yet?

Last week we released a new version of DigiLinX Dealer Setup software to our authorized dealers that takes our DigiLinX system to a whole new level. Our NetStreamers have been working very hard and the result is very exciting. The following is an outline of the new products that we introduced recently or began shipping.

Favorites – This is the feature set that we have all been waiting for. Favorites allows dealers to setup ‘one button’ macros for their end-users, so that can launch a host of actions by the selection of onscreen buttons. i.e. An Evening Favorite button tells our Lutron lighting system to set the lights to a predetermined level and it turns on our jazz music. Our HBO Favorite turns on the TV, selects the correct channel, dims the lights, and sets the system to a predetermined volume. Favorites takes DigiLinX to a whole new level and it will only get better from here as our NetStreamers add more customization to Favorites and DigiLinX over time. A very cool feature introduced is that I can make Favorites my home page and even change the name to something else.

Streaming Music Manager (SSM) – This product is a rack-mount or set-top product that plugs into the network, then auto-discovers PCs, MACs, network storage or other devices that touch the network, which contain uncompressed (WAV / PCM) or compressed (MP-3) shared audio files. The SMM then proxies up to six uncompressed streams of music.

My nephew and I just installed my SMM a couple of weeks ago. In my house, I have my music and video stored on a network storage device and this product is exactly what we needed. The most exciting feature for me is that the SMM finds the music on our home network, no matter where it is stored, PCs, MACs, or Linux machines and network storage, and consolidates all of our music so that my family and I don’t have to remember where a particular song or album is stored. We see one list and we can chose our music by Song, Album, Artist, Genre, or Playlist. I am told that, in the near future, we will be able to create playlists, dynamically, by just clicking on songs that we want. I can’t wait.

One final SMM feature I want to tell you about is that when we plugged our iPod into one of the SMM’s USB ports, we were able to auto discover it on the network and extract up to six (6) streams from the iPod, along with its meta-data, so that each family member could listen to their own song from the iPod, at the same time as other users were listening to their song of choice. Very cool indeed.

DoorLinX – This is going to be the world’s first IP-based ‘door intercom’. I am told that this starts shipping this month (Nov-2006), and it can’t come a moment too soon. My wife is tired of the hole by the front door and our visitors having to knock on the door very loudly in order for us to hear them. However, I believe that it will be worth the wait.

Our IP Intercom system is the best intercom system that I have ever heard because it comes out through the room speakers and not a $2.00 speaker on a wall intercom or on a phone. Besides the obvious ding-dong, DoorLinX will give us some additional features. We will be able to select any MP-3 that we want to use as a ringer and tell it what rooms or hallways to ring into. In the future, DoorLinX will be able to play different ringers at different times of the day, or different days of the year. I can’t wait until it can also ring my phone to let me know that the UPS guy is there when we are not home. I could then answer the door and ask him to place the package on the side of the house or in the garage, after I open the door for him remotely.

MediaLinX Pro (MLA4000) – Today to integrate a legacy source product (an audio or video product that does not speak TCP/IP such as CD players, tuners, DVDs, etc…), and have that available for listening on the network with native products (music servers, PC, etc…), a NetStreams dealer must connect that source to the network via a media converter product, which NetStreams calls MediaLinX. Until now, an installer had to purchase one MediaLinX per source. NetStreams will soon bring out a 4-channel version of MediaLinX that will also bring with it some new features that dealers will be able to take advantage of to create more cool and compelling applications. This includes controlling curtains, screens, and more.

Well… that’s it for now folks. Although Christmas is less than two months away still, it sure felt like Christmas this week. You can expect that I will be playing with all of these new options and features this weekend.

In my next blog entry I plan on telling you about wiring for the house of the future – today. This allowed me to build a full IP-based home, ready for all of those wonderful IP products on the way. I am especially excited to see and ready for IPTV (more about this in another future entry).

Friday, October 20, 2006

Changes

Well… no excuses…. guilty as charged. It has been a long time since I have made new entries into this blog, but I thought that given that we are launching this new website, I’d take this opportunity to recommit myself to this blog. I am also happy to announce that I have hired a new CEO – Kevin Reinis, to drive the NetStreams bus and free me up to do the things that I love to do the most – driving the vision for the Company, its products and technology, and evangelizing the emerging world of IP-based networked entertainment. In addition to the latter, I will now serve as the Company’s Chairman. I am very excited about Kevin joining our team and look forward to working with him.

Another exciting thing that has happened to me over the last few months is that my family and I have finally moved into our beautiful IP-based home here in Austin, Texas, which was under design/construction for over two years. We are delighted with our home and it is a must see house, as it is loaded with the latest and greatest IP-based systems and products including our very own DigiLinX and Panorama products. Other products used were Polk Audio IP speakers and XM tuner, Lutron, Panasonic IP cameras, Parasound tuner, Marantz and Lexicon AVRs sitting on Middle Atlantic racks. Over the next few weeks, I plan on giving you more details about this IP home and its products and share our experience with you. As they say in the industry ‘I am now eating my own dog food’. But let me tell you…. it tastes awfully yummy.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Tell Congress NOT to let Hollywood control your home!

Gary Shapiro of the CEA testified recently in front of Congress against a proposal to protect this distribution and recording of all audio & video content. This proposal was made by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).

Way back the days when the VCR was first introduced, Hollywood was upset and concerned that people would record broadcasts and not watch live news or go to movies. A similiar hearing was held in front of Congress and legislation resulted that allow a consumer to make 1 copy for personal use.

What this new technology yielded was an entire new business resulted -- video releases of movies, video rental, etc.

Now with new digital technologies there is a push to eliminate the ability to create copies for personal use AND prevent the time and space shifting of content.

If they succeed, you can say goodbye to your TiVo. If you are one of the fortunate people to have a Multi-Room Video system, you can say goodbye to watching 1 DVD movie on multiple TVs throughout your home during a party. And forget ripping music from a CD, or distributing music to different rooms in your home for playback.

If they succeed, you will probably have to buy all new equipment. Because the broadcast flag they want to embed in the encoder and the decoder of the content hasn't been developed yet. So some CE manufacturer will have to develop some costly copy protection scheme, get everyone to adopt it as a standard, and then you'll have to buy all new expensive equipment just to receive TV or satellite radio broadcasts.

Check out Gary's speech transcript on http://www.ce.org/. And stick up for your rights as a consumer by calling your congressman!

Wednesday, October 05, 2005

MP-3... Not for Demanding Music Lovers

If you're making the investment to upgrade your home by having a multi-room audio system installed, please remember this point....

MP3 audio quality is nice for headphones but is not as good as uncompressed (CD Quality) .WAV files.

The science behind compressing an audio file supports this, and on occasion I have heard the difference but nothing like I had heard yesterday. A friend had a party to show off his new multi-room audio system. At first glance, it was impressive -- 12 rooms of audio with in-wall keypads and high quality speakers (Polk). But we soon noticed a difference in sound quality when switching sources from his CD player to his ipod. The sound floor automatically dropped several dB and the high frequencies with the song recorded in the compressed MP3 format vs. the same song we had heard previously off of the CD were non-existant.

Simply put -- the song on MP3 sounded dull and flat over the Multi-Room Audio system, but the same song on CD sounded rich and full.

When I had asked my friend what bit rate he had recorded the song to MP3, he told me it was 300 kbps, not a bad sampling rate at all. In fact, when we unplugged the iPod and listened to the song over the small headphones, it didn't sound as flat as it did over the Multi-Room audio system, though admittedly it wasn't as good as the original CD.

We then recorded the song to an uncompressed (.WAV) file format and it sounded almost as good as the CD.

Why the difference in audio quality between MP3 and uncompressed (.WAV)? Well, let's look at the technology. MP3 audio is a specially formatted and havily compressed computer file. Depending on the sample rate, the audio quality can sound close but not equate to that of a CD. An uncompressed audio file of 1 minute consumes nearly 9 megabytes (MB) of disk space. An MP3 file uses only about 1 MB of disk space for that same minute of audio. This reduction in file size has revolutionized the delivery of music, because it is now easier to transmit music over the internet. A song that would have taken almost an hour to download (depending upon the connection speed) can now be download much quicker. However, in exchange for the smaller file size, the listener sacrifices 70% of the data that holds what some describe as the 3-D characteristics of the audio necessary to create staging, imaging, and rich audio texture. An uncompressed (.WAV) music file contains all of the data found on a CD, without any of the compression of loss of data. This offers the listener the highest quality audio available from a CD.

The difference in audio quality is of course more perceptible with better quality speakers and better quality amplification.

If you're interested in hearing for yourself the difference, visit the demo section of our website. http://www.netstreams.com/demos.aspx

Saturday, September 03, 2005

Our Hearts Go Out

Our hearts go out to everyone in the gulf coast who are suffering from Hurricane Katrina. Many of our NetStreams employees have donated their time and skills to the American Red Cross building computers and assisting in creating networks so that displaced people can contact their families, and those separated from eachother at various Texas shelters can be re-connected.

Our hearts are with all those suffering.

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Digital Music Servers

Maximizing your digital music server can allow you to take full advantage of the technology. Why? Well, think about this. Digital music servers are a great way to store and enjoy all of your songs. Depending upon the size of the hard disc drive, you can record 10,000 ~ 30,000 of your favorite songs with the cover art, artist and album information, as well as the genre for each song.

But, with a traditional system, how many songs can you listen to at one time in different rooms of your home?

Well, the answer to that depends upon the number of discrete audio outputs on the music server, because each output must be connected to a multi-channel amplifier so that it can be routed to each room.

So we were thinking....there is a fundamental disconnect with what the technology can provide from a music server and how it is implemented with a traditional system today in the marketplace. Imagine this -- I can run multiple applications on my PC. Right now I've got my browser open, my email open, an .xls spreadsheet, and a press release from my VP of marketing open on my PC, not to mention several Microsoft word documents. All open. All running at the same time.

Since a digital music server is essentially a PC (it has a hard disc drive, a microprocessor, a CD-ROM drive for recording music, and an operating system), why not be able to listen to several songs in several rooms throughout the home?

And with a traditional installation, I need to turn on my TV to listen to my music coming from a music server, because I need to be able to select what I want to listen to. So that's another cable I have to hook up. When I explained all this to my daughter a year ago, the conversation was really funny, because she kept asking "But Dad, why do I have to turn on the TV to listen to music?"

Why indeed...

With our IP-Based DigiLinX products it can be done. We've partnered with some of the best digital music server companies in the marketplace - ReQuest (http://www.request.com/); Escient (http://www.escient.com/) and Imerge (http://www.imerge.co.uk/) and made them compatible with our solution. What does this mean -- well, with one CAT5 connection from the media server to our switch, I can listen to up to 6 separate songs (or "streams" of music, as we like to call them) in different rooms or groups of room s at a time. And I don't need to run a video cable because the menu to select the songs stored in the media server appear on any touch screen in the home.

Now that's progress.

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

The State of the Industry

I read an article today in the September / October issue of Robb Report Home Entertainment & Design about "networked control" and it struck me how far behind the consumer electronics industry is in thinking about TCP/IP. (Note this edition is not yet posted on their website but the print issue is beginning to circulate. Go to your newstand and look for this magazine. I find it very insightful!).

Yes, controlling audio, video and home automation products over TCP/IP is a no brainer. Frankly, we all should have moved towards this years ago. My company was beginning to work on this 7 years ago, back when we were the incorporated as GE Smart and were a joint venture with General Electric and Microsoft.

Why do I say the industry is behind where it should be? It seems to me that too many people in our industry think about TCP/IP in the sense that it is just another protocol, like RS-232, RF or IR.

CE Manufacturers of high end equipment started putting RS-232 connectors on their devices in 1997. In the Robb Report article, Jared Lewis (an installer) is quoted as saying "If you think about it, we never got there on RS-232. I mean, you're just starting to see RS-232 on entry level to mid-grade components." And this is now 2005!

To think that our industry may take just as long to transition to a complete IP-Based system (not just IP-Based Control) makes me worry about the future of the CE manufacturer. Our counterparts, the PC Manufacturers, move much quicker on a new technology, especially when they identify a significant enhancement which will improve the value proposition for the consumer. (The key here is improving the value proposition significantly!).

Sure, you could use TCP/IP to control products, but TCP/IP was designed to deliver content too. It's not impossible to do that. At NetStreams, we've proven that with our DigiLinX system, which has been selling for several months now. A whole host of media server manufacturers have enabled their Ethernet connections so that audio is distributed over TCP/IP (more about that in a later post).

Simply controlling A/V equipment over TCP/IP is, in my opinion, not a compelling value proposition to the market. However controlling AND distributing the entertainment content is very attractive to the consumer. Why? Well to name a few reasons:
- Audio can be distributed to multiple rooms digitally and with high resolution (over TCP/IP)
- Multiple songs can be listened to from one hard disc drive based media server (over TCP/IP)
- the system is extremely flexible and scalable

There IS a difference between IP-Based Control and a complete IP-Based system. For those investing in a new system in their home, make sure you're compatible for the future.

Friday, August 12, 2005

My First Blog Post

My name is Herman Cardenas and I am Chairman and Founder of NetStreams, a company based in Austin Texas. NetStreams was formed with the idea that all consumer electronics (your TV, DVD player, Speakers, PC etc) in the home will distribute their entertainment content and communicate with each other using TCP/IP (the same language as the internet).

Why TCP/IP? It's the same language as the Internet. The architecture makes it easily expandable. It's an open protocol, so it's easier to configure a system to communicate with and control a variety of products from a variety of manufacturers. And it's the same language that the computers in your home use to talk to each other.

No Question -- IP is the future.

With this vision, Netsteams created and shipped DigiLinX, the world's first IP-Based Multi-Room Audio system in the market. (IP-Based meaning that the system distributes audio, data, and control over TCP/IP).

So what's so difficult about creating an IP-Based Multi-Room Audio system? Well the biggest issue that NetStreams overcame is the ability to synchronize the audio. Synchronization of high quality audio is important in a Multi-Room Audio system. Why? TCP/IP was primarily developed to distribute data, and never designed to be real-time. Imagine if I'm sitting in a room with 3 people and I send one email to all of them. We're all in the same room, but one person might get it before another person and so on. With audio, if you're listening to the same song in the kitchen and the dining room over an IP-Based system without synchronization, you would hear a strong echoing effect when you're walking from one room to another.

Maybe you're wondering why I wrote this blog? Well... several reasons....

  • I wanted to share, with interested people, my thoughts on the future of home entertainment and technologies, as wellas my personal experience with the same.
  • I know that from my experience as a home builder that choosing the right technology and wiring for your home (whether it's a new build or a remodel) is a confusing and frustrating experience for many, so I thought I might be able to help.
  • And of course, I'd like to hear your comments and ideas.

Best,

Herman